A remote pilot and visual observer disagree about whether an obstacle clearance during a flight is adequate. The VO believes the aircraft is too close to a rooftop; the pilot believes there is sufficient margin based on the camera feed. Who has final authority and what should happen?
Why →
Under § 107.19, the remote PIC holds final authority for the operation. However, CRM principles require that safety-critical input from a crew member be acknowledged and evaluated before dismissing it. A VO's obstacle clearance warning is exactly the kind of safety-critical call that should trigger an immediate pause, not a debate. The PIC verifies, then makes the call. Dismissing a VO warning without verification is a documented CRM failure pattern in aviation accidents.The trap →
Choice A is technically correct about authority but misapplies CRM principles. Authority does not mean ignoring crew input. Choice C overstates the VO's role. The VO provides information; the PIC decides.SOURCE → 14 CFR § 107.19; FAA ADM, Crew Resource ManagementCHECKED APR 22ACS V.C.K1MED